Regarding Human alike robots and Cloning?

17apr19> It seems like this evolving human race has reached a critical level and now by its own innovative approach it is trapped and trying to destroy itself. Time has come to a stage when we are expecting human alike robots. Japanese robotics has already gave some prototypes and BBC click is enough to show you all practical evidences. The VR (virtual reality) and Ai (Artificial intelligence) and the robotics are now inevitable in picturing emerging reality. Using VR simulation and Ai are necessary technology advancements to solve many real life problems. The artificial robot hands are doing plenty of works in unbelievable quick and in bulk mode. Machine-humans will not fall into sickness, the productivity will increase and they will contribute more then we do to the corporate world. But if anyone think that robots will solve all problems of the world and we human are to put out of order in this fast rolling over world, shouldn’t I disagree? If so then how? My point of bringing up this issue is not putting question on VR or Ai, nor it is on their practical applications, and or about Robot hands or Robotic automations, they are doing real good. My concern is more to the discussion on cloning vis a vis human alike robots.

Few days back the idea of robots were like steel bodied boxed faced machine type mechanical structure which has Ai and which listens to the human commands only. But today this picture has been changed, we are seeing inventors are trying to make robots more alike human beings. These new models are having silicon based skin more alike human body and their expressions in face and in body movement viz, the why they walk, talk all are made in a way that it shall look exactly like human beings. My point of concern is just here.

May we remember what were the issues concerning against human cloning? Wasn’t it like, If we see another alike me in front of me standing, why should I feel afraid or abnormal? Or in which point the issue of denial comes in human cloning? Is it the identity question that we may face, or is it some thing not natural that we might get into and therefore shall deny the situation? As per my thinking, cloning hadn’t been so easy or successful and its research created a kind of fear among some powerful people that maybe the reason on why it has been stopped. More or less it hurt’s the human pride of being the self. “I made this, I was this and that, I did this and that which no other could have done before”, these are the pride and if we look broadly this is the tendency among people to claim that he or she is unique and no other can be alike him or her, now if this happens that somehow similar to his body another looks and does alike things then how to comprehend or compare it to own self? or measure it’s value against us, I think these are the main issues on rejection of its reality ?

Well now lets stop thinking on cloning of human alike bodies, and focus on robotics? If I find a robot just alike me and not clone of me then what is the difference? Well it is not human and it do not have a human soul or free will claiming to be me, it has to obey me as it has been created by Ai, so I am having here my another body directed by me, then what is the problematic issue here?, rather it is a kind of extended another me, it shall help me in increasing my working ability, Now if we put this two variables into the burning Question’s equation, I think we can solve it now. The same me if made by cloning is not acceptable by my intellect but if it is done by a completely look alike robot then I have no problem, isn’t it the scenario? If so then it clearly reflects that we deny cloning of self as it might put own self into conflict but if we can extend its ability by clon robots then our intellect or soul shows no problem. It therefore is very clear that it is our pride “of Me or I did it, made it and is unique” related paradox.

Long ago, not so long ago a young boy asked the panel in a conference that okay agreed let cloning be forbidden as per religious view points, then, what about cloning of human body parts. We see sometime we are in need of a broken arm or a malfunction heart, to fix with a new one, if cloning can give us a new flesh body arm or heart then what is the problem, rather this should be appreciated. My question is if another human is possible by cloning and it become a new way of giving birth in human race then exactly where does the full stop mechanism occur. Why we to put a full stop here? Prior birth control technology there were a random new born scenario, after the technology wide spread now we have a new situation and human race is dealing with it normally. If there be an alternative new way to give birth where does the problem stands? Another critical question may I wish to raise?, why people wish to make human alike robots, why not they think of making supreme alike robots? Well in cartoons and cinemas they have brought in the thought already but it is the inherent desire of human that they seek to make human alike robots perhaps to feel being creator of their same image, they wish to create human as like they believe their creator created them in his image, or for those who don’t believe in God, it is their wish to become the ultimate supreme God, the unmoved mover but even then they wish to make their creatures in their images? By this are they are willing to add a meaning to the existing universe? Or don’t they have the ability to think beyond human. 

 

Looking from a broader angle we see, this human race couldn’t solve the big question on God, created many explanations, theories, myths and religions and then divided their concepts and made it more and more complex day by day. Whether God is alone or many hasn’t yet or ever been solved unanimously, Some even denied the concept of creator and believed in evolution of the Nature. They couldn’t solve the core question of creation rather they are now willing to play God. zenno’s famous paradox which says, there can’t be two or many but one alone as many will eventually derivate into many more and will continue to dissolve into eternity as like the mirror inside mirror tends to infinity affect. So the concept of one can’t be living with the concept of many, they may become contradictory. If there is one alone and He created two or many, then is he among many or stand alone one? If He is the one then is the creation derivative of him? Well we better not loose our focus point discussion.

If we shift the focus to a different angle, say for example a state leader willing to manufacture his entire army based on cloning or by human alike robots based on the best performance human solders he had of all times then what is the obstacle here on doing so? Or say for in the case of male or female partner choosing among general people, if anyone wish to have a clone or human alike robot friend of his or her choice then where is the problem? Moreover it maybe adjustable to any new upgrade or modification and can have multiple face or body change facility including attitude control by Ai interfacing.

What will then be the reality? aren’t we talking about Man made reality? The dramatic changes in reality has been evident during past few decades. Just think about the telephone facility shifts, think about the traveling systems and yes these changes created great impact in our daily living and for sure the emerging trends are vigorously trying to change our next era life styles. This shifts in life style surely demands a change in our background philosophy but human tendencies is that they won’t change their philosophy only because they have fallen in love with it. No matter it contradicts the reality, they will stick to the plan and the grad design. Any threat to their belief system they will protect as if that belief is saving them from being demolished.

21apr19> I am  not concluding this article with a complete judgment as I  myself is yet unclear what new technologies may bring up next. And I have no intention to impose my thoughts on others or say against any belief system. Here I have raised some queries regarding the subject matter which went through my mind with an objective to seek other’s opinion on the same.